GreenAI Services Jadavpur University

Beyond thePrompt

AI Literacy as Disciplinary Practice

Venue: Jadavpur University
One Day Hands-on Workshop & Roundtable

NEP 2020 §12.7 UGC Responsible AI 2023 DPDP Act 2023 AICTE AI Curriculum Framework

Proposed by GreenAI Services Pvt. Ltd.  (DPIIT-Recognised AI Startup  ·  Kolkata · Mumbai)
in academic collaboration with the School of Cognitive Science, Jadavpur University

Explore the Programme
Programme Snapshot

At a glance.

Format
Full-day, live, on-campus workshop
Duration
8 hours · 10:00 AM – 6:00 PM
Structure
5 facilitated sessions + 2 panel discussions + inauguration, policy synthesis & closing
Key Additions
Dedicated DPDP Act 2023 session + No-Code Agentic AI session
Disciplinary Tracks
Track A: STEM · Track B: Social Sciences · Track C: Humanities
Pre-Workshop
30-min async onboarding at least 48 hours prior to workshop day
AI Models on Platform
Claude Sonnet 4.x · Gemini 2.5 Flash · DeepSeek · Grok
Certificate
GreenAI–Jadavpur University Co-branded Digital Certificate upon verified participation
Data Privacy
DPDP 2023 compliant · Isolated per-participant data vaults · DPA signed with JU
Venue
Dr. H L ROY Auditorium, Jadavpur University
Registration Fee
INR 3,538 (inclusive of GST)
Bulk Rate
Institutional rate available for departments
The Challenge

Fluency is not the same as rigour.

Large Language Models produce fluent, confident, well-structured text. This fluency is precisely what makes them dangerous in academic settings. A paragraph that reads well is not necessarily a paragraph that reasons well — and this distinction is the central intellectual challenge that generative AI poses to every department in the university.

"The target outcome is not AI adoption. It is AI sovereignty: the capacity of each faculty member to engage with these tools as an informed, critical interlocutor."

This programme equips faculty to critically evaluate what AI produces, identify where it fails within their own discipline, and make sovereign decisions about when, whether, and under what conditions to deploy it in research, teaching, and institutional governance.

NEP 2020 §12.7

Mandates integration of emerging technologies into faculty development with disciplinary rigour and verified outcomes.

UGC AI Guidelines 2023

Calls for critical AI literacy — the capacity to evaluate, interrogate, and responsibly deploy AI, not mere tool familiarity.

DPDP Act 2023

Not merely referenced but taught — a dedicated session on compliance obligations that directly affect academic AI use.

AICTE Framework

Recommends experiential, project-based learning embodied throughout the day's facilitated sessions.

What Sets This Apart

Five features. One programme that
actually differs.

01
Discipline-Specific Architecture

Three parallel tracks — STEM & Formal Sciences, Social Sciences & Economics, and Humanities, Arts & Philosophy — within a single cohort. Every hands-on exercise, prompt template, and critique methodology is calibrated to the epistemic norms of each field.

02
Verification Over Prompting

Most AI workshops foreground prompt engineering — how to get better outputs. This programme inverts that emphasis. The core competence developed is critical verification: the ability to identify what an AI has misrepresented, whose knowledge it has erased, and what epistemic assumptions it has silently imported.

03
DPDP Act 2023 as Substantive Session

Data protection is not relegated to a compliance footnote. A dedicated session unpacks the DPDP Act as it directly affects faculty who use AI in research, teaching, and student assessment — covering consent architectures, data fiduciary obligations, and cross-border data flows to LLM providers.

04
Demonstration of No-Code Agentic AI

Demonstration of autonomous, multi-step AI workflows that can execute complex academic tasks such as literature synthesis across 50 papers, systematic data extraction, multi-source fact-checking etc.

05
Discipline specific use statements

The workshop goes beyond conversation: participants draft discipline-specific AI use statements that can be used as a feed for framing institutional policy.

Disciplinary Framework

Three tracks. One cohort.

All participants attend the same plenary sessions and panel discussions, but hands-on exercises are customised by track. This respects the epistemic diversity of JU's faculty without fragmenting shared intellectual experience.

Pre-Boarding

Online, T–48 hours

Workshop Day

8 Hours · 10:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Conducted entirely live and on campus. Click any session to expand details.

Highlights of the Day
⅓ hrs
Inauguration
2⁵⁄₁₂ hrs
Expert Instruction
2½ hrs
Hands-On Workshop
1½ hrs
Panel Discussion
1¼ hrs
Breaks
(Tea ×2 + Lunch)
10 AM11121 PM23456 PM
Inauguration
Expert Instruction
Hands-On Workshop
Panel Discussion
Break
Speakers & Panelists

The Minds Behind the Day

This programme brings together faculty members and experts from STEM, Social Sciences, Humanities, Law, and Computer Science, drawn from some of India's foremost institutions.

Enduring Value

A deliverable that outlasts the day.

Deliverable

GreenAI AI Prompting Platform Access

A unified, DPDP-compliant interface integrating multiple frontier LLMs under a single academic login. Compare outputs across models — making bias, variation, and failure modes visible in ways no single-model experience can.

Claude Sonnet 4.x Long-form synthesis & structured reasoning
Gemini 2.5 Flash Fast, iterative drafting & summarisation
DeepSeek Open-weight, sovereignty-aware workflows
Grok Real-time web-grounded information

Complimentary token allocation included · Isolated per-participant data vaults · Full DPDP 2023 compliance · On-premise deployment option available

Clarity of Scope
This Programme IS
A discipline-specific critical AI literacy programme designed for expert scholars at a Category-I Institute of Eminence
Grounded in NEP 2020, UGC-AI 2023, DPDP Act 2023, and andragogical principles appropriate for senior academic professionals
Honest about bias, hallucination, data privacy, regulatory obligations, and the epistemic limitations of current AI systems
Inclusive of emerging paradigms — agentic AI, no-code workflows — with emphasis on governance, not just capability
Backed by a tangible deliverable: a multi-model prompting platform with sustained post-workshop access
Production of discipline-specific AI use statements
This Programme IS NOT
A general "How to use ChatGPT" tutorial
A technology sales pitch or vendor demonstration
A replacement for disciplinary methodology or scholarly judgment
A one-time event with no enduring deliverables
A reason to trust AI-generated citations without verification
A beginner's coding or computer science workshop
Verified Learning Outcomes

Upon completion, participants will demonstrate the ability to:

1
Critically situate Large Language Models within their specific disciplinary epistemology — identifying failure modes, training data biases, and field-specific limitations.
2
Design and execute structured, Intent-Driven prompts (Level 4 IDRCTOC) for complex research synthesis, course design, and academic writing tasks.
3
Apply a Red Team verification protocol to AI-generated academic content, distinguishing verified knowledge from AI-generated conjecture.
4
Interrogate AI outputs for cultural, linguistic, and representational biases — particularly as they affect Indian academic traditions, Indian Languages literatures, and non-Western epistemologies.
5
Identify and navigate the DPDP Act 2023 obligations triggered by common academic AI workflows — consent requirements, data fiduciary responsibilities, and cross-border transfer implications.
6
A brief introduction to the agentic AI paradigm — the agent loop, no-code workflow design, and governance protocols required to supervise autonomous multi-step AI tasks in academic contexts.
7
Articulate a clear, discipline-specific personal and departmental stance on AI disclosure, academic integrity, and responsible AI use in line with UGC 2023 guidelines.
8
Navigate a multi-model AI platform to compare outputs across different LLMs, developing the comparative judgment essential for genuine AI sovereignty.